AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 17 November 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hynninen, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by Laine, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hynninen, V. V.
Right arrow Articles by Laine, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00530-08
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Voriconazole increases while itraconazole decreases plasma meloxicam concentrations

V. V. Hynninen*, K. T. Olkkola, L. Bertilsson, K. J. Kurkinen, T. Korhonen, P. J. Neuvonen, and K. Laine

Department of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology at Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; TYKSLAB, Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Turku, Finland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: vilhyn{at}utu.fi.


   Abstract

This study investigated the effect of voriconazole, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and CYP3A4, and itraconazole, an inhibitor of CYP3A4, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meloxicam. Twelve healthy volunteers ingested in a cross-over study 15 mg meloxicam, without pretreatment (control), after voriconazole pretreatment, and after itraconazole pretreatment. Plasma concentrations of meloxicam, voriconazole, itraconazole and thromboxane B2 (TxB2) generation were followed. Compared to the control phase, voriconazole increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-72) of meloxicam by 47% (P < 0.001) and prolonged its mean half-life (t1/2); by 51% (P < 0.01), without affecting its mean peak concentration (Cmax). In contrast, itraconazole decreased the mean AUC0-72 and Cmax of meloxicam by 37% (P < 0.001) and by 64% (P < 0.001), respectively and prolonged its t1/2 and time to Cmax. Plasma protein unbound fraction of meloxicam was unchanged by voriconazole and itraconazole. Lowered plasma meloxicam concentrations during the itraconazole phase were associated with decreased pharmacodymic effects of meloxicam, as observed by weaker inhibition of TxB2 synthesis compared to the control and voriconazole phases. Voriconazole increases plasma concentrations of meloxicam, whereas itraconazole, unexpectedly, decreases plasma meloxicam concentrations, possibly by impairing its absorption.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.